Home / Blog

FOB, EXW or CIF: Which Incoterm to Buy On, and What Each One Really Costs

Ask a factory for a price and you will usually be quoted FOB. Ask a different factory and you might get EXW, or CIF, and the numbers will not be comparable even though they look like they are. The term attached to a price decides how much of the journey is included, where your risk starts, and how much cost is still sitting outside the figure you are looking at.

Most importers end up on FOB, and usually that is right. But it is worth understanding why, because the situations where it is the wrong answer are the ones that cost the most.

What each term actually covers

There are eleven Incoterms. In practice, importers buying from overseas factories deal with three.

EXW, Ex Works, is the least the supplier can do. The goods are made available at their factory and everything after that is yours: loading, inland transport to the port, export clearance, terminal handling, freight, insurance, arrival charges, import clearance, delivery. The price looks the lowest of the three, and it is, because almost nothing is included.

FOB, Free On Board, means the supplier delivers the goods onto the vessel at the origin port. They handle inland transport, export clearance and the origin terminal charges. From the moment the goods are loaded, cost and risk are yours: freight, insurance, arrival charges, import clearance and delivery.

CIF, Cost Insurance and Freight, means the supplier also pays the ocean freight and a basic level of insurance to the destination port. You take over at arrival: terminal handling at the destination, customs clearance, duty and taxes, and inland delivery.

CIF sounds like the supplier is covering more risk. They are not. Under CIF, risk still transfers when the goods are loaded at origin, the same as FOB. They pay for the freight, but if something happens mid-voyage it is your problem, not theirs.

Why FOB is the usual answer

FOB is the default for most importers because it splits the journey at the most sensible point. The supplier handles the part they know and you cannot easily control, which is getting goods from their factory through export clearance and onto a vessel. You handle the part where you have leverage and visibility, which is the freight and everything at your end.

That gives you three practical advantages.

• You choose the forwarder, so you can compare rates rather than accepting whatever the supplier arranges.
• You see the real freight cost as a line item rather than buried inside a unit price.
• You control the booking, which matters when a sailing is cancelled or you need to switch to air freight to recover a date.

That last one is worth more than it sounds. On CIF, the supplier books the freight, and if you need to move faster you are asking a factory to renegotiate a booking they have no incentive to change.

When EXW is worth it, and when it is a trap

EXW is genuinely useful in two situations. If you have a forwarder with a strong presence at origin who can collect from the factory and handle export clearance cheaply, you may beat the supplier's FOB charges. And if you are consolidating from several suppliers in the same region into one container, EXW lets your forwarder collect from each of them.

The trap is buying EXW without either of those and assuming the low unit price is the real price. Under EXW you are technically responsible for export clearance in the supplier's country, which as a foreign buyer you often cannot do yourself, so it gets handled by the supplier or your forwarder anyway and charged back, frequently at a worse rate than the supplier's own FOB terms would have been.

The other cost is the one nobody quotes: loading at the factory, inland transport, and origin documentation. On a small order these can be a surprisingly large percentage.

When CIF makes sense, and its real cost

CIF suits a first order with a new supplier when you have no forwarder relationship yet, or a small shipment where the effort of arranging freight is not worth the saving. It is simpler, and simple has value when you are learning a lane.

The cost shows up in two places. Suppliers rarely pass on freight at cost, so there is usually a margin built in, and because it is inside a single price you cannot see it. And the insurance included under CIF is a minimum level of cover, typically 110 percent of the invoice value on restrictive terms, which is often less protection than you would buy yourself.

The bigger issue is at the destination. Under CIF the supplier's nominated agent controls the shipment at arrival, and destination charges from a nominated agent can be considerably higher than what your own forwarder would charge. Importers new to CIF are regularly caught by arrival invoices that wipe out the apparent saving.

Comparing quotes on different terms

This is where the money is. Two suppliers quote you and one is FOB and one is EXW, and the EXW price is lower. That comparison is meaningless until both are brought to the same point.

The only reliable way is to convert everything to landed cost per unit: the price you pay, plus every charge between the factory and your warehouse, divided by units. Not per shipment, per unit, because that is the number your pricing is built on.

1. Start with the quoted unit price and the term it is quoted on.
2. Add everything the term leaves out, in the same currency.
3. Include duty and any import taxes, calculated on the correct basis for your country.
4. Add brokerage, terminal handling and delivery at your end.
5. Divide by the number of units.

Do that for both quotes and the ranking often flips. It is common for a higher FOB price to land cheaper than a lower EXW one once origin charges are counted.

Compare two quotes on different Incoterms properly. The free landed cost calculator adds duty, freight, insurance and fees to get a real per-unit number, with live currency conversion. Open the free calculator

What to check on any quote, whatever the term

• The named place. FOB Ningbo and FOB Shanghai are different costs. A term without a named port or place is incomplete.
• Which Incoterms version. 2020 is current, though 2010 is still used. State it on the purchase order.
• Whether export clearance and origin documentation are included, in writing, not assumed.
• Who pays terminal handling at origin, which is the single most common source of surprise invoices on FOB.
• Whether the quote covers palletising, fumigation or special packaging, which are often extra.

A note on FCA, which is often the better FOB

FOB was written for goods loaded over the rail of a ship, which suits bulk cargo rather than containers. For containerised freight, risk under FOB technically transfers when the goods are loaded on board, but in practice you hand your container over at the terminal days earlier, leaving a gap where nobody is clearly responsible.

FCA, Free Carrier, closes that gap by transferring risk when the goods are handed to your nominated carrier. It is the technically correct term for container shipments, and worth knowing about, even though FOB remains what almost everyone in practice uses and asks for.

The bottom line

FOB is the sensible default for most importers because it hands the supplier the part of the journey you cannot control and keeps the freight decision in your hands. EXW only pays off with a strong origin forwarder or a multi-supplier consolidation. CIF buys simplicity and costs you visibility, usually at both ends. Whichever you use, never compare two quotes on different terms at face value: bring both to a landed cost per unit and let that decide.

Related guides

• LCL vs FCL: When to Ship Less Than a Full Container
• Sea vs Air Freight: Which to Use and When (FCL vs LCL)
• Ex-Works, FOB, CIF: Incoterms Explained for Importers

Landed Cost Calculator is free and needs no account.